Semantic structure
Use meaningful headings, landmarks, and control names so that a page is understandable beyond its visual arrangement.
Interface quality includes the experience of people who navigate, read, or interact differently. This capability concerns structure, input methods, readable presentation, and the conditions needed for an effective review.
01 / SCOPE
Use meaningful headings, landmarks, and control names so that a page is understandable beyond its visual arrangement.
Examine keyboard access, focus visibility, the behavior of disclosures, and the information a control communicates when its state changes.
Consider text size, contrast, responsive layout, and reduced motion. Preserve the essential information when a decorative effect is unavailable or disabled.
02 / WORKING MATERIAL
The final set of deliverables depends on the agreed brief, available content, and implementation responsibilities.
03 / ILLUSTRATIVE BRIEF
An essay page may be read with a mouse, a keyboard, enlarged text, or assistive technology. The contents, headings, notes, and links should still have an understandable relationship when the visual arrangement changes.
A review can identify specific barriers and propose corrections. Its scope should name the pages, states, devices, and methods examined. That record is more meaningful than an unsupported badge or a blanket promise about every visitor’s experience.
Illustration only. No customer engagement or performance result is implied.04 / REVIEW QUESTIONS
SCOPE BOUNDARY
This capability description is not a claim of certified conformance. A formal accessibility assessment needs an agreed standard, defined scope, appropriate methods, and documented findings.
Further reading: W3C WAI on page headings ↗